All Letters to the editor articles – Page 55

  • Does MGM have a hit?
    Opinion

    Don’t Bury it yet

    2009-06-26T00:00:00Z

    Having seen Studio MGM’s timber-framed and clad apartments rise from a particularly drab corner of the Bury St Edmunds ring road over the past couple of years, I was aghast at John Henry Kneller Eborn’s prejudiced and ill-informed letter (June 19)

  • Opinion

    Barrier grief

    2009-06-26T00:00:00Z

    While I think that shared spaces offer an improvement on the cluttered streets we tolerate, the thought that they exclude blind and partially sighted people makes me uneasy

  • Opinion

    Bad education

    2009-06-26T00:00:00Z

    Tim Ward’s letter (June 19) raised only one aspect of the architectural students’ woes. The other is that they leave their schools with a woefully inadequate education

  • Opinion

    Just accept it

    2009-06-26T00:00:00Z

    Well done Amanda Baillieu for saying what many people have feared to

  • Opinion

    Help us fight fees

    2009-06-19T01:18:00Z

    In response to the mass email issued by Sunand Prasad (News page 6), if the RIBA wishes to help smaller firms of architects and sole practitioners deal with the perpetual expectancy to carry out work on spec and partake in fee bidding, it should do something a bit more robust ...

  • Opinion

    MGM tearjerker

    2009-06-19T00:19:00Z

    I must counter Alan Moon’s letter “Baffled by Bury” (June 12).

  • Opinion

    Unfair advantage

    2009-06-19T00:16:00Z

    Richard Rogers’ call for a national inquiry into the prince’s constitutional role should be welcomed

  • Opinion

    Bonny prince

    2009-06-19T00:15:00Z

    I work with communities where the planners, architects and corporations they represent are riding roughshod over livelihoods and treasured environments

  • Warzone: Chelsea Barracks.
    Opinion

    Rally to Rogers

    2009-06-19T00:13:00Z

    It’s with no surprise that we read the people’s architect Prince Charles is single-handedly able to alter the course of one of the most important projects in London this decade

  • Opinion

    We can’t all run back to daddy

    2009-06-19T00:07:00Z

    Recently your magazine, to my despair, has highlighted the snobbery of the architectural world (News June 12)

  • Opinion

    Stuck on style

    2009-06-19T00:00:00Z

    The discussion about a suitable architectural form for the expansion of Oxford University (Leader June 5) steps once again into the modernism versus traditionalism debate, which springs up in all historic and conservation environments

  • Opinion

    Waking the dead

    2009-06-19T00:00:00Z

    Owen Hatherley (Opinion June 22) notes that sobriety and abstraction are fashionable virtues for memorials but architects often seem to have problems distinguishing between the zeitgeist and a rather more holistic and historical attitude towards sculpture and memorials

  • Opinion

    Trust is robust

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    I would like to make it clear that your leader on the unfortunate collapse of the Civic Trust (May 29) was referring to the “Southern English” Civic Trust

  • Opinion

    Monitor madness

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    Interesting to read (News May 29 ) that the Arb plans to monitor competence

  • Opinion

    Cul-de-sac cure

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    In her thought-stimulating article, Carolyn Steel (Opinion June 5) does not mention the basic general objection to massive development in the Thames Gateway

  • Opinion

    Beware theme park pastiche

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    Oxford University has a great opportunity to make a significant addition to contemporary architectural culture (News June 5)

  • Bury scheme proved perplexing.
    Opinion

    Baffled by Bury

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    Emily Greeves’ review of Studio MGM’s housing scheme in Bury St Edmunds (Works May 29) says the “module of the frame describes the measure of the rooms inside” but it clearly does not if the floor plan is correct

  • Opinion

    Bad rap for Wrap

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    I was surprised to read your article about Wrap (News June 5) which said that no architects had yet signed up to its call to reduce waste levels at design stage

  • Opinion

    Correction: 12.06.2009

    2009-06-12T00:00:00Z

    Last week’s news story “RIBA plans summit with shadow cabinet” incorrectly said that the RIBA’s European Election manifesto called for a reduction of the minimum duration of architectural studies from five years to four.

  • Opinion

    Oversee this

    2009-06-05T00:00:00Z

    The JCT standard building contract for a home owner/occupier 2005 proudly announces, for signature, that it is for ithe owner/occupier who has appointed a consultant to oversee the works