All Letters to the editor articles – Page 75

  • Opinion

    Poor plot

    2008-05-02T00:00:00Z

    Last month’s Housing issue of BD Magazine includes features on The Bridge (multi-material, multicoloured housing for people and birds, insufficient space for essential means of transport), Silvertown (greeny, gardeny, dusty, debris-ridden cladding needs replacement in 25 years), and Evelyn Road (lack of ventilation, exterior design badly affects internal function).

  • Opinion

    Partners, please

    2008-05-02T00:00:00Z

    Your report “Gateway needs single delivery body, say experts” (News April 25), completely misrepresents my views about the delivery of the Thames Gateway project.

  • Opinion

    Great teamwork

    2008-05-02T00:00:00Z

    Peter Wilson (Letters April 25) quotes Lord Fraser in support of your claim that the Scottish Parliament Team was dysfunctional and that this added to costs and delays.

  • Opinion

    Liverpool cares

    2008-05-02T00:00:00Z

    In your front page story “EH acts to save historic buildings in Liverpool” (News March 20), you write that English Heritage has “toughened its stance in recent months”, and that Liverpool has been “shamed into action”.

  • Bishopsfield mini-festival, 1969. Courtesy Museum of Harlow
    Opinion

    After Robin Hood Gardens: help Bishopsfield too

    2008-05-02T00:00:00Z

    A letter to BD from Bishopsfield residents group highlights the threat to Neylan and Ungless's 1960's estate

  • Opinion

    Be transparent

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    Further to Renzo Piano’s comments on the RIBA/Home Office workshops (News April 18), it has been erroneously reported that these and guidance encourage the creation of no-go urban fortresses.

  • Sweatshop: latter-day Bennetts?
    Opinion

    Sweat and tears

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    I was startled to see the photo used to illustrate the Debate on April 18.  Captioned “Team working at Bennetts Associates”, it looked more like a call centre or dealing room.

  • Opinion

    Word perfect

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    The rewriting of history is always interesting, but John Kinsley protests too much (Letters April 18) when seeking to chastise BD for describing the EMBT/RMJM joint venture on the Scottish Parliament building as dysfunctional.

  • Outbuildings face tighter rules
    Opinion

    Out of the loop

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    “Good” can also come out of the dodgy wording of the General Permitted Developments Order (“Mockery of the planning system” Letters April 18).

  • Robin Hood Gardens: justly feted in Paris
    Opinion

    Paris sees RHG as a star exhibit

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    BD readers backing the Robin Hood Gardens campaign may be interested — but not surprised — to learn that while the minister for culture (sic) and Tower Hamlets’ Council are conspiring to demolish the Smithsons’ estate, in Paris it is now the star exhibit of a large retrospective show on ...

  • Opinion

    Drawing a line

    2008-04-25T00:00:00Z

    Richard Brindley’s response to the question “Plan drawers are undermining us” (Practice April 3) just shows how out of touch the RIBA has become.

  • This “permitted development” has sparked outrage in north London.
    Opinion

    Mockery of the planning system

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    I was interested in Marcus Fairs’ comments (Opinion, April 4) and in the letters in response. Hackney is not alone in falling victim to the “tricky developer” and the apparent failings of the planning and building control systems to control “unauthorised development”.

  • Opinion

    Good relations

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    As project architect of the RMJM half of the EMBT/RMJM joint venture partnership on the Scottish Parliament building, I cannot concur with your statement that our relationship with EMBT was “dysfunctional” (News March 28).

  • Opinion

    We do declare

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    In your story about RIBA declarations (News April 11) you chose not to include a key point about the RIBA, so here it is:

  • Opinion

    Question of cost

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    I wish to clear up any confusion derived from the selective references you make to my letter of reply to Lord Rogers of Riverside about the costing of the Robin Hood Gardens refurbishment (bdonline April 11).

  • Opinion

    Correction

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    Marks Barfield’s Michael Tippett School in south London (News April 11) cost £7.6 million, not £25 million as stated.

  • Opinion

    Chief concerns

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    I was a little disturbed by the proposal for a “chief architect” as reported in BD (News April 11) and in particular by the comparison with other sectors — those with a chief medical officer or chief scientist, for example.

  • Opinion

    Not a-peeling

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    More silly iconic architecture promoted on the front page of your paper (April 11), this time from Foster & Partners.

  • Opinion

    Windsor abuses

    2008-04-18T00:00:00Z

    Marcus Fairs’ experience (Opinion April 11) is nothing! The problem with unapproved developments being built is becoming endemic and the failure to enforce unpalatable conditions is rife.

  • Opinion

    Stone timebomb

    2008-04-11T00:00:00Z

    We in Liverpool now await the battle for the exterior finish on what was supposed to be the flagship icon of Liverpool’s Capital of Culture 2008, the Museum of Liverpool (Solutions April 4).