Stirling finalist questions winner’s eco-credentials

Goldsmith Street ©Matthew Pattenden_3

Source: Matthew Pattenden

Whole-life carbon more important than Passivhaus, argues Matthew Barnett Howland

The environmental credentials of this year’s Stirling Prize winner have been called into question by the architect of one of the defeated projects.

Matthew Barnett Howland said whole-life carbon should be a more important consideration than achieving Passivhaus accreditation.

He was speaking at the Stirling Prize party after Mikhail Riches’ Goldsmith Street council housing in Norwich was named the winner and hailed for being Passivhaus-compliant as well as 100% social housing.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.