It’s time to stop using ‘pastiche’ as a pejorative term

Giles Heather

The word has long been used to unfairly malign architects working in the classical tradition. We need to reclaim the term and celebrate the fact that precedent and tradition are at the heart of most good contemporary architecture, writes Giles Heather

I am old enough to remember the style battles of the 1980s, and I knew which side I was on – it seemed completely self-evident that the futuristic modernity of Rogers’ Lloyds building knocked Terry’s Richmond riverside into a cocked hat.

And this wasn’t just aesthetics, this about being on the right side of history, of taking one’s place in the refreshing updraft of Progress.

What Terry was held to be up to by most of the architectural profession was something called “pastiche”, and it was certainly not cool and almost definitely morally questionable – see how those floorplates crossed those sash windows! Pearls were clutched in widespread disapproval.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.