The Coach: How to end the tyranny of back-to-back Teams calls

Louise Rodgers crop 2

We need to talk about meetings, says Louise Rodgers – but not for long

Last week I got into an online dialogue with an ex-colleague. He is currently development director for a major regeneration project in Birmingham, one which will require the collaborative effort of many people who need to share the same vision and sense of purpose.

He was just returning from an important on-site tour and meeting aimed at convincing a range of stakeholders, from central and local government to funding organisations, of the project’s excitement and potential. My interest was piqued because in a short social media post he managed to communicate what a buzz it was to be there, in person, with all the people on whom the success of this project depends.

We got into an exchange, and he said how exciting it was to be having a face-to-face meeting. “It felt great. Invigorating,” he said. “The ability to see people’s reactions and watch the ‘tone’ of the room, noticing who was and who wasn’t paying attention.” And then, importantly: “It felt 10 times more productive than doing it on Teams. On Teams, the gravity of the ‘ask’ would not have been perceived in the same way. It was both exhilarating and exhausting.”

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.